The regulator asks why
A door supplier keeps putting back its fire certificates. Eighteen months later, the Building Safety Regulator asks what was agreed.
Since October 2023, every higher-risk building in England has needed the Building Safety Regulator’s approval before work starts, and every change after that is assessed and recorded. The regime was introduced after the Grenfell Tower fire.
This paper is about what that record keeps: not only the documents, but the reasons and conditions inside them.
April 2025
Harbourside Quarter, Block C, is a twelve-storey residential block in Bristol, built by Severn Build. Every flat was to have a glazed fire door from Harwood, each certified for its exact configuration.
Harwood has put back the certificates for the glazed doors three times. The programme needs doors on Levels 4 to 12.
Fire & Building Safety agreed, with a condition. Commercial and Design agreed.
Harwood’s certificates arrived for Levels 4 to 7. For Levels 8 to 12 they never came, and Severn Build applied to the regulator to use another certified door.
Autumn 2026
The regulator asks what evidence was held for the glazed doors when they were hung, and why the supplier changed on the upper floors. It reaches Laura Bennett, Head of Building Safety.
Without Pohja
Everyone who took the decisions is still at Severn Build. James Carter remembers the doors going in once the paperwork was sorted. Mark Davies remembers holding back Harwood’s payment.
Helen Morris remembers refusing to hang uncertified doors. She is less sure whether the rule was every door, or every floor.
The delivery notes, the certificates and the emails show what arrived and when. None of them says what was agreed while the certificates were missing, or why.
With Pohja
Laura asks Memory. It answers only from what was decided, and links the decisions that speak to the question.
No door hung without the certificate for its exact configuration. It was on the record from the day it was agreed.
The golden thread tells you to keep the record. Pohja keeps the reasoning inside it.
The people are still here. The detail wasn’t.
Severn Build is a fictional organisation. Its people and records are illustrative. Every screen shown is real. The process described follows the Building Safety Regulator’s guidance, Making changes to a higher-risk building project; this is not legal advice.